Posts: 8894
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 27709 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22145 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23059 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23387 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23059 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 23993 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24188 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24043 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24614 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24286 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24476 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25236 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24696 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25392 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24826 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25356 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25154 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25355 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24972 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 24884 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25108 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 24710 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24972 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25355 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25154 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25356 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24826 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25392 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24696 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25236 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24476 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24286 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24614 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25058 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24206 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23780 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23141 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 22728 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23141 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23780 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24206 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24043 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22145 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.