Posts: 8810
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23093 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18554 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19359 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19684 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19359 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20227 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20421 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20308 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20687 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20647 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20728 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21261 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21052 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21507 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21150 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21462 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21410 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21451 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21289 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21030 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21230 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21108 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21289 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21451 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21410 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21462 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21150 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21507 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21052 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21261 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20728 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20647 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20687 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21071 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20489 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19874 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19418 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18866 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19418 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19874 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20489 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20308 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18554 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.