Posts: 8922
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 29582 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23477 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24394 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24742 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24394 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 25339 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25547 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25450 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26050 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25695 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25867 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26698 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26115 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26816 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26269 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26762 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26612 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26742 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26349 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 26387 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26493 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26048 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26349 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26742 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26612 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26762 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26269 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26816 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26115 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26698 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25867 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25695 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26050 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 26445 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25574 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25162 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24525 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24086 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24525 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25162 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25574 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25450 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23477 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.