Posts: 8797
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20469 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16433 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17213 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17530 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17213 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18008 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18174 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18119 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18313 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18400 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18419 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18817 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18794 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19030 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18831 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18945 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19092 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18965 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19006 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 18807 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 18729 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 18805 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19006 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18965 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19092 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18945 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18831 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19030 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18794 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18817 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18419 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18400 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18313 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18667 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18236 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17549 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17306 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16627 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17306 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17549 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18236 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18119 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16433 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.