Posts: 8797
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20656 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16602 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17401 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17758 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17401 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18230 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18413 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18310 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18529 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18616 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18634 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19032 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19014 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19258 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19057 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19171 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19327 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19190 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19224 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19036 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 18995 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19047 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19224 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19190 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19327 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19171 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19057 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19258 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19014 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19032 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18634 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18616 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18529 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18888 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18519 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17748 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17501 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16818 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17501 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17748 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18519 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18310 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16602 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.