Posts: 8797
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21243 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17146 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17922 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18280 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17922 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18763 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18943 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18854 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19073 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19182 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19209 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19613 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19592 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19848 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19644 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19755 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19898 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19784 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19797 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19594 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19524 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19611 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19797 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19784 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19898 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19755 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19644 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19848 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19592 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19613 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19209 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19182 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19073 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19442 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19025 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18246 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17985 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17294 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17985 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18246 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19025 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18854 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17146 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.