Posts: 8809
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23062 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18515 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19322 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19647 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19322 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20193 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20390 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20264 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20637 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20604 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20682 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21212 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21017 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21464 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21106 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21404 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21372 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21406 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21255 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20994 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21189 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21080 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21255 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21406 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21372 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21404 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21106 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21464 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21017 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21212 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20682 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20604 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20637 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21031 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20452 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19838 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19388 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18815 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19388 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19838 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20452 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20264 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18515 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.