Posts: 8961
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 31527 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25236 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26160 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 26582 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26160 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 27131 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 27395 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27327 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 27988 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27627 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 27809 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28654 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 27965 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28693 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28151 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28649 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28548 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28655 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28232 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 28362 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 28391 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 27868 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28232 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28655 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28548 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28649 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28151 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28693 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 27965 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28654 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 27809 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27627 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 27988 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 28336 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27451 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 26995 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26298 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 25884 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26298 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 26995 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27451 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27327 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25236 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.