Posts: 8801
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22900 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18366 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19194 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19505 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19194 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20058 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20267 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20128 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20466 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20452 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20524 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21031 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20867 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21276 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20945 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21225 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21222 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21226 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21097 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20846 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21019 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20937 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21097 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21226 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21222 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21225 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20945 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21276 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20867 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21031 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20524 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20452 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20466 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20851 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20326 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19663 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19247 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18638 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19247 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19663 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20326 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20128 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18366 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.