Posts: 8797
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20689 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16677 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17440 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17805 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17440 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18272 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18453 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18361 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18580 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18666 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18694 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19091 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19077 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19322 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19120 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19228 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19383 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19244 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19275 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19091 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19041 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19093 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19275 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19244 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19383 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19228 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19120 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19322 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19077 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19091 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18694 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18666 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18580 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18932 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18566 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17788 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17539 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16858 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17539 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17788 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18566 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18361 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16677 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.