Posts: 8902
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28545 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22734 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23640 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24011 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23640 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24598 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24787 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24639 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25221 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24911 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25111 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25885 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25331 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26037 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25460 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25987 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25817 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25957 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25559 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25552 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25731 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25318 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25559 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25957 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25817 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25987 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25460 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26037 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25331 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25885 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25111 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24911 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25221 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25667 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24788 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24382 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23746 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23323 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23746 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24382 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24788 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24639 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22734 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.