Posts: 8809
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23080 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18530 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19337 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19666 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19337 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20210 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20404 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20283 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20658 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20623 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20707 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21238 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21031 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21483 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21132 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21434 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21392 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21427 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21273 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21011 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21211 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21099 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21273 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21427 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21392 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21434 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21132 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21483 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21031 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21238 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20707 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20623 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20658 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21050 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20471 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19853 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19401 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18842 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19401 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19853 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20471 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20283 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18530 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.