Posts: 8800
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22693 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18224 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19015 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19337 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19015 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19879 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20064 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19959 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20279 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20281 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20352 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20830 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20704 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21074 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20788 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21022 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21062 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21029 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20947 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20705 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20821 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20754 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20947 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21029 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21062 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21022 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20788 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21074 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20704 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20830 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20352 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20281 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20279 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20649 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20153 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19458 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19067 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18433 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19067 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19458 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20153 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19959 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18224 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.