Posts: 8923
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 29619 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23502 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24420 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24773 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24420 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 25374 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25578 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25486 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26071 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25726 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25900 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26730 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26147 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26845 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26298 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26789 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26641 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26767 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26372 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 26421 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26522 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26083 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26372 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26767 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26641 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26789 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26298 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26845 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26147 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26730 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25900 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25726 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26071 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 26475 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25597 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25190 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24550 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24110 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24550 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25190 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25597 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25486 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23502 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.