Posts: 8797
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20993 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16922 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17699 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18050 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17699 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18523 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18712 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18626 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18856 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18938 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18977 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19373 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19352 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19609 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19402 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19527 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19687 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19541 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19566 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19354 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19305 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19362 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19566 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19541 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19687 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19527 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19402 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19609 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19352 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19373 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18977 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18938 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18856 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19206 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18825 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18057 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17802 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17102 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17802 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18057 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18825 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18626 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16922 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.