Posts: 8797
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20692 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16687 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17449 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17811 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17449 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18279 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18461 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18369 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18585 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18672 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18702 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19099 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19081 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19330 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19129 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19234 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19389 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19253 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19278 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19098 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19044 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19095 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19278 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19253 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19389 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19234 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19129 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19330 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19081 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19099 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18702 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18672 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18585 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18940 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18567 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17793 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17549 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16861 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17549 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17793 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18567 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18369 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16687 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.