Posts: 8800
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22676 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18205 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19001 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19323 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19001 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19864 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20057 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19943 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20267 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20264 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20336 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20819 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20689 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21062 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20779 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21008 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21038 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21016 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20933 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20690 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20814 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20744 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20933 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21016 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21038 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21008 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20779 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21062 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20689 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20819 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20336 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20264 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20267 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20632 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20141 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19440 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19051 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18423 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19051 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19440 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20141 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19943 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18205 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.