Posts: 8961
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 31461 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25169 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26093 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 26518 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26093 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 27067 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 27324 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27258 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 27916 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27560 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 27738 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28584 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 27900 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28632 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28092 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28582 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28476 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28582 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28163 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 28297 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 28322 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 27808 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28163 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28582 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28476 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28582 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28092 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28632 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 27900 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28584 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 27738 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27560 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 27916 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 28273 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27381 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 26925 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26232 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 25812 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26232 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 26925 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27381 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27258 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25169 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.