Posts: 8852
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26048 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20763 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21621 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21928 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21621 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22473 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22700 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22542 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23113 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22800 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22956 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23674 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23211 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23879 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23314 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23849 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23593 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23828 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23459 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23295 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23621 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23261 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23459 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23828 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23593 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23849 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23314 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23879 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23211 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23674 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22956 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22800 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23113 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23552 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22723 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22312 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21664 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21292 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21664 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22312 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22723 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22542 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20763 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.